Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress exists in most occupations—and the biomedical Sengineering field is no exception. So what can you do about it?That was the topic of a recent meeting of the SouthEast Texas Clinical Engineering Society (SETCES). Some biomeds face a great deal of stress because of their constantly changing priorities, according to Doug Dreps, biomedical engineering manager at Memorial Hermann in Houston, TX, who led the discussion.But there are other sources of stress as well, including a drive to complete preventive maintenance schedules, meet the demands of a heavy workload caused by staff shortages, adapt to new management or management strategies, remain educated about the technological changes in the industry, and balance work and home priorities.To relieve stress, the group decided that it was best to focus at work on the task at hand. Doing the best you can with available resources and “shutting off the work switch” when you go home are two practical means of managing stress, they decided.Long Beach, CA, was the location of the first annual Pan American Health Care Engineering (PAHCE) Conference and Workshop, held earlier this year. The theme for the week-long event was “Linking Healthcare Needs and Technology Across the Continents.”The presentations focused on issues such as: Other conference highlights included training and assisting future clinical engineers with the skills needed to manage their own hospitals and healthcare systems; providing access to medical equipment and support through buying programs, donations, and sponsorships; and providing exchange programs for students and engineers to share knowledge and expertise in improving healthcare across the Americas.The conference was held thanks to the support of PAHO, the American College of Clinical Engineering, the California Medical Instrumentation Association, and other well-established groups. For more information, visit www.pahce.acsup.org.The stage is set for the 29th Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (CMBEC), which will be held June 1–3, 2006 in Vancouver, BC.“In addition to several technical sessions on current technologies and management trends, participants will be able to interact with professionals and experts in the field to explore current issues and share experiences,” says Anthony Chan, conference chair and biomedical engineering program head at the British Columbia Institute of Technology.This year's theme is The Future of Medical Device Technology. The conference will include scientific/academic, clinical engineering, and medical device industry sessions. A new session titled Finding Solutions to Practical Problems has been added to encourage industry and health practitioners to present practical problems that have yet to be solved.“We hope that attendees connect with those experiencing similar situations and solving similar problems. It's nice to hear about novel solutions to the same old troubleshooting and management issues,” says Chan.For more information, visit http://www.cmbes.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.908 | 0.844 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".