MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256044958 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(18)30013-7

Cabot Corp enjoys strong finish to 2017 fiscal year

2017· article· en· W4256044958 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditives for Polymers · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiscal yearNet incomeQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural economicsEconomicsBusinessGeographyFinanceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For its full fiscal year ended 30 September 2017, Boston-based Cabot Corp posted net income of US$241 million, up more than 60% year on year from $149 million in 2016, on net sales of $2.72 billion, some 13% higher than the $2.41 billion achieved the previous year. Fourth quarter net income of $68 million in 2017 was 31% higher than $52 million a year earlier, while quarterly net sales rose 17% year on year, from $619 million in 4Q 2016 to $723 million.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0190.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1490.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditives for PolymersSame topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207