MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256050036 · doi:10.1186/s41687-018-0087-9

Proceedings of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Conference Birmingham 2018

2018· article· en· W4256050036 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBirmingham Biomedical Research CentreCollaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater ManchesterOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSurgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research CentreKeele UniversityWarwick Medical SchoolUniversity of OxfordUniversity of BirminghamUniversity of WarwickUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
KeywordsPatient-reported outcomeOutcome (game theory)MedicinePsychologyNursingEconomicsQuality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the success of the last two PROMs Research Conferences held at University of Sheffield (2016), St Anne’s College, University of Oxford, (2017) we report the proceedings of the 2018 conference hosted by the Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research at the University of Birmingham, UK on 20th June 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.085
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.111
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0850.111
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Patient-Reported OutcomesSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207