MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256052148 · doi:10.1177/0027950107083044

Growth and Labour Input in North America

2007· article· en· W4256052148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Institute Economic Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Liberian dollarInflation (cosmology)FellWage growthLabour economicsExchange rateReal wagesWageMonetary economicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Output growth slowed in the US and Mexico in the first quarter of 2007, while the Canadian economy accelerated. The US and Mexico both suffered from weak export growth, with the housing market continuing to put strain on domestic demand growth in the US. In aggregate, North American growth slowed to just 0.3 per cent relative to the previous quarter. Inflation accelerated in both the US and Canada in the first half of 2007, prompting a rise in Canadian interest rates. Rising inflation stems partly from tight labour markets, which have put upward pressure on wages. Labour market pressures in Canada are likely to be offset by the impact of the 6 per cent rise in the country's effective exchange rate between the first and second quarters of 2007, whilst the renewed weakness of the dollar, which fell by 2 per cent in effective terms between the first and second quarters of 2007, is likely to exacerbate inflationary pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Institute Economic ReviewSame topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207