Pope & Talbot Inc. <i>v</i>. Government of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
127 Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Award on Merits of Phase 2 — Tribunal finding Canada in breach of Article 1105 — Canada liable to Investor for resultant damages — Effect of NAFTA Free Trade Commission’s interpretation of Article 1105 Treaties — Interpretation — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Article 1105 — NAFTA Free Trade Commission issuing interpretation of Article 1105 — Commission’s interpretation issued subsequent to Award on Merits of Phase 2 — Whether Commission’s interpretation valid exercise of Commission’s power — Whether binding on arbitration tribunal — Whether operating retroactively — Validity of arbitration tribunal’s Award on Merits under Article 1105 — Whether tribunal’s interpretation of Article 1105 compatible with Commission’s interpretation — Nature and content of customary international law — Whether Canada violating Article 1105 Damages — Whether Investor entitled to damages under Article 1105 — Heads of damages — Whether recoverable — Final award on costs — Articles 38 and 40 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".