MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256098857 · doi:10.1504/ijmme.2018.091218

Oil sands production scheduling and waste management with optimum cut-off grade policy

2018· article· en· W4256098857 on OpenAlexaff
Navid Seyed Hosseini, Eugene Ben Awuah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStockpileTailingsOverburdenOil sandsNet present valueWaste managementOpen-pit miningEngineeringLand reclamationEnvironmental scienceScheduleMining engineeringProduction (economics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cut-off grade is the criterion that separates ore from waste and it determines the amount of ore and waste material in the final pit limit. To generate an optimum production schedule for the mine life, cut-off grade optimisation is used to determine the cut-off grade, duration of mining of the grade and the amount of material mined. This research developed a heuristic optimisation model that generates an optimum cut-off grade policy and a schedule for ore and waste material including overburden (OB), interburden (IB) and tailings coarse sand (TCS) dyke materials for dyke construction in oil sands mining. Scenarios investigated include: no stockpiling and stockpiling with limited reclamation duration. The scenario of reclaiming the stockpile after one year had the highest net present value (NPV) as well as the highest cut-off grade profile. Reclaiming the stockpile after two years had less NPV due to reduction in processing recovery resulting from oxidation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining and Mineral EngineeringSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207