MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256168900 · doi:10.7202/016620ar

Liminaire

2006· article· fr· W4256168900 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Justin K. Bisanswa, Kasereka Kavwahirehi

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les essais qui suivent constituant autant de lectures diffrentes des rapports entre roman francophone et savoirs, le principal point commun ces diffrentes approches est leur attachement la richesse de la dimension interdisciplinaire du roman. La corrlation entre le(s) savoir(s) et le roman francophone d'Afrique et des Antilles est de ces vidences aveuglantes : chacun doit devi ner ce qu'elle recouvre, en l'associant tantt au contexte colonial, tantt l'environnement sociohistorique des pays au lendemain de leur indpendance. Mais, ds qu'on entend la dfinir et la cerner his toriquement, les perplexits se multiplient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207