Bibliographic record
Abstract
From its earliest days when it was known as the Mississippi Valley Historical Association, the OAH has had a deep interest in the teaching of American history in our precollegiate institutions. More recently that interest was manifested in the creation of the OAH Magazine of History in 1985. Funded by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities, the fledgling Magazine was designed “for junior and senior high school teachers.” Since then it has grown in size and circulation, improved in appearance, and expanded its audience to include professors teaching the introductory survey at community and four-year colleges and universities. For most of its history, the Magazine has been assembled each quarter by a guest editor, usually a historian specializing in the theme of the issue; Managing Editor Michael Regoli, currently the OAH Director of Publications; and a graduate assistant from the Indiana University Department of History, currently Susanna Robbins. Considering that none of these editors worked full-time on the publication, the quality of the product and its improvement over the years is all the more impressive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".