40Ar/39Ar Dating and Characterization of Hornblende from the Nelson Plutonic Suite, Southern Kootenay Arc, SE B.C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Kootenay Arc located in SE B.C. has experienced more than one episode of tectonism, metamorphism and plutonism. The Mid-Jurassic to Eocene thermal history of the area has been investigated using K-Ar and 40/39 dating methods of biotite and muscovite; however there are no reliable hornblende dates from this area. This study will investigate two easterly stocks of the Nelson Plutonic Suite, the Mine and Wall stocks. Both of these have U-Pb zircon ages between 171 and 168 Ma but record a wide range of mica cooling and overprinting dates between 166 Ma in the west and 67 Ma in the east. 40Ar/39Ar age spectra for hornblende from 11 rocks in these stocks comprising a transect of the area, will aid in defining the higher temperature part of the thermal history. Previous attempts to prepare bulk hornblende separates were unsuccessful due to overgrowths and intergrowths of biotite, chlorite, plagioclase and K-feldspar. Part of this study involves testing the efficiency of SELFRAG disaggregation, which uses pulses of electrostatic power to break apart the biotite-hornblende-epidote granodiorite along mineral cleavage planes and grain boundaries. This should lead to higher purity mineral separates and better dates. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Microprobe analysis analyse the separates looking for K-rich inclusions and the hornblendes variation in chemistry. Ca/K ratios are typical of igneous amphibole. Combined with previous K-Ar and 40/39 results for micas these hornblende dates should provide some insight into the history of the Next Creek fault and the thermotectonic history of the area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".