MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256227870 · doi:10.3406/ahrf.2002.2582

La place de la partie lésée dans le procès pénal révolutionnaire

2002· article· en· W4256227870 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Leroy

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFalse accusationLegislationLawPolitical scienceRestitutionHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jacques Leroy, The Place of the Injured Party in the Revolutionary System. What were, during the Revolution, the rights of victims of crimes in the penal system ? The analysis of the relevant legislation permits two observations. First, from the time of the Constituent Assembly, the victim could become an accuser. The revolutionaries rediscovered the virtues of private accusation, and it would take them 10 years to eliminate it in favor of public accusation. One may note that the Old Regime had already arrived at the same conclusion in the Criminal Ordinance of 1670. Second, the Convention inscribes clearly for the first time the definitions of public and civil lawsu its in the 1795 Code of Penalties and Punishments, thereby definitively fixing the claims of injured parties in the repressive process. Whatever the procedural prerogatives at their disposal, victims could only use them for reparatory ends. In this respect, the 1670 Ordinance had already taken the first step. Legislation passed in the wake of the Revolution would confirm the separation of the functions of prosecution and restitution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207