MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256234532 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011190

Effects of targeting higher versus lower arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in preterm infants

2014· reference-entry· en· W4256234532 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Askie, Brian A. Darlow, Peter G. Davis, Neil Finer, Ben J Stenson, Máximo Vento, Robin K. Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational agePediatricsSmall for gestational ageGestationObstetricsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: What are the effects of targeting higher versus lower oxygen ranges on death or major neonatal and infant morbidities, or both, in extremely preterm infants? Do these effects differ in different types of infants, including those born at a very early gestational age, outborn, without antenatal corticosteroid coverage, male gender, small for gestational age, multiple birth or by mode of delivery?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.019
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207