MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256283952 · doi:10.1097/med.0b013e3282f370af

Motilin

2008· review· en· W4256283952 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Poitras, Theo Peeters

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Saint-Luc
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotilinObestatinGhrelinReceptorPharmacologyMotilityInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Motilin is a hormone produced from endocrine cells of the duodenal mucosa to help regulate motility of the digestive tract. This review discusses new findings on the potential impact of motilin in human medicine. RECENT FINDINGS: Motilin is a member of the peptide family that includes ghrelin whose cDNA also encodes a new candidate peptide, obestatin. Physiological interactions between these products will have to be explored. Pharmacological agents, agonists as well as antagonists, to motilin receptors are now emerging for clinical application. Motilin-receptor characterization, regarding its localization on nerves or muscles, as well as its biochemical mechanisms to sensitization for example, will be important steps in the design of future motilin agonists or antagonists. SUMMARY: Motilin is a fascinating hormone for the physiologist. Its interaction with the family member ghrelin and with obestatin will open new areas for basic research. Motilin-receptor agonists or antagonists could soon be part of the therapeutic arsenal of the clinician to improve digestive dysmotility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and ObesitySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207