Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. No 8, Ideologías en obras sobre la lengua española (ss. XV-XX)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Definir el concepto de ideologa de forma completa y abarcadora a la par que satisfactoria plantea un variado compendio de dificultades. La mayora de las propuestas examinadas sostiene que es, en primera instancia, un conjunto de ideas, el cual, seguidamente, se afina segn el rea de estudio. Sin embargo, este punto de partida, ms que ofrecer una solucin, remite a nuevas preguntas, empezando por qu es una idea?: cualquier producto mental: una opinin, una creencia, un inters, una motivacin, una ocurrencia...? De ser as, las ideas seran equiparables si se asocian a un individuo, a una comunidad, a una institucin o a una poca? Cada una de estas entidades genera y exterioriza la ideologa de la misma manera? Cules y cuntas ideas conforman una ideologa? Bajo esta inconclusa miscelnea, la totalidad ideolgica adquiere una complejidad y un dinamismo inconmensurables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it