Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate Change Plan for Canada The Climate Change Action Plan for Canada was tabled in the House of Commons by the Minister of the Environment, the Hon.David Anderson, on 21 November 2002 in advance of Parliamentary deliberations on the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol which began 25 November 2002.The aim was to outline how Canada can meet its greenhouse gas reduction target under the Protocol which was formally ratified on 17 December 2002.The Plan addressed objections to the earlier document released on 24 October 2002 and responded to concerns of industry.Its authors claim 'This Plan strikes the balance needed to enable our economy to flourish even as we reduce our greenhouse gas emissions' and 'This Plan proposes both short-term action and a longer-term perspective.'The report of 55 pages is divided into the following sections: (I) Climate Change and the United Nations Kyoto Protocol; (2) Canada's Approach to Climate Change; (3) Meeting our Target and Innovating for the Longer Term; (4) Canadians, Communities and Governments: Each Doing Our Part; (5) Improving Our Understanding of Climate Change and Preparing to Adapt; (6) Accountability; and (7) Conclusion.There is also an Annex of 10 pages titled 'Analysis and Modeling of Cost Impacts' that is mainly a synopsis of the modeling reports issued earlier.The overall approach outlined in the Plan reflects the principles suggested by provincial and territorial governments in their 28 October 2002 statement.These may be summarized as: (l) a made-in-Canada John Walsh is an independent energy advisor in Ottawa.Update, in continuous preparation for future issues ofthe "Energy Studies Review", may be found on the web at: \\'H•lI'.oaf!es.c([.il1!('r.lU.!f;~iJn1'{t1sh/l/lJda{e.htllll John Walsh may be reached at .f!IIFa!s!I({/;ca.illler.net
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".