MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256357428 · doi:10.1002/9781119312994.apr0519

The Role of Post‐Translational Enzyme Modifications in the Metabolic Adaptations of Phosphorus‐Deprived Plants

2017· other· en· W4256357428 on OpenAlexaff
William C. Plaxton, Michael W. Shane

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Plant Reviews online · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycosylationEnzymePosttranslational modificationBiochemistryBiologyPhosphorylationSUMO proteinCell biologyGeneChemistryUbiquitin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Post‐translational modification ( PTM ) is the covalent alteration of a functional group of a specific amino acid residue within a particular protein. Diverse protein PTMs represent pivotal regulatory mechanisms that integrate signalling, development, gene expression, metabolism, and stress responses in plant and animal cells. These PTMs : (i) are often genetically predetermined, rapid, interconnected, and reversible; and (ii) can not only dramatically alter an enzyme's activity but may also generate specific PTM ‐dependent docking sites that influence its interactions with other proteins. The aim of this chapter is to highlight three crucial PTMs (phosphorylation, monoubiquitination, and glycosylation) and to provide examples of their participation in the in‐vivo function and control of several key enzymes that facilitate plant acclimatisation to soluble phosphate (Pi) ‐deficient soils. Pinpointing the impact of altered Pi supply on the prevalence, mechanisms and functions of enzyme PTMs will make an important contribution to the implementation of effective biotechnological strategies for engineering crops having enhanced P‐acquisition and P‐use efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Plant Reviews onlineSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207