MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256399136 · doi:10.15695/amqst.v1i1.11

Introduction

2004· article· fr· W4256399136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmeriQuests · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O my America, my new found lande, My kingdome, safeliest when with one man man'd, My myne of precious stones, my Empiree, How blest am I in this discovering thee! --John Donne, "To His Mistris Going to Bed"An abstraction grew around him . ..the ruling abstraction of himself which he saw reflected nowhere.He was a ruler of men and a ruler of nothing.The sun rose into the blinding wall and river before him filling the stream and water with melting gold.He dipped his hand in but nothing was there.--Wilson Harris, Palace of the Peacock (1960) At the beginning of the 21 st century, divisive regional thinking continues to dominate relations among the countries and territories that comprise the Western Hemisphere.For many, "America" is still only the United States.In this construction, Canada is, at best, an afterthought, a nation indistinguishable from the U.S. even at the level of international telephone dialing codes.Others use "America," as in José Martí's famous phrase "Nuestra América," to refer exclusively to Latin America, bypassing Brazil and the Caribbean (except for Martí's native Cuba).Much is lost, at times nearly destroyed, in these limited, and limiting, constructions of the hemisphere.What is one to do about this?How can one begin to dispel the misapprehensions that so many American-in the extended sense of that plural-hold about each other?The Center for the Americas at Vanderbilt and its new journal, AmeriQuests, believe that the answer lies in furthering the beneficial impact that ideas and academic research have on lived realities.Bringing together scholars and innovators of all sorts, the Center for the Americas at Vanderbilt investigates the cultural, economic, and political interactions between the countries and territories of the Western Hemisphere and between the region and other parts of the world.Using its research, the Center develops and helps sustain lasting partnerships that solve problems of particular importance to the Americas.In the process, the Center reshapes the ways in which the academy conducts research, evaluates research results, and trains future generations of scholars.This is the Center's mission.In practical terms, the Center develops innovative research, pursues endeavors that cross disciplinary, social, and national borders, and endeavors to make it widely accessible in languages other than English, notably Spanish, Portuguese, and French.The list of the problems that trouble the Americas today and thus create the subjects of the Center's work is, regrettably, a long one.It includes immigration and human rights tensions, poverty, racial and ethnic discrimination, the limited quality and availability of education, public health crises, and widespread abuses of natural resources.But since these problems are hardly unique to the Americas, what, beyond wanting to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it