Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helen Gilbert, ed., (Post)Colonial Stages: Critical and Creative Views on Drama, Theatre and Performance, reviewed by Brian Crow Anton Wagner, ed., Establishing Our Boundaries: Engligh-Canadian Theatre Criticism, reviewed by James Dugan Ric Knowles, The Theatre of Form and the Production of Meaning: Contemporary Canadian Dramaturgies, reviewed by Reid Gilbert Nicholas Grene, The Polirics of Irish Drama: Plays in Contex from Boucicault to Friel, reviewed by Nick Worrall Katharine Worth, Samuel Beckett's Theatre: Life Journeys, reviewed by Lois Oppenheim Kalina Stefaniva, ed, Eastern European Theater after the Iron Curtain, reviewed by Michal Kobialka Robert Leach and Victor Borovsky, ed.,A History of the Russian Theatre, reviewed by Donald Rayfield Donald Rayfield, Understanding Chekhov: A Critical Study of Chekhov's Prose and Drama, reviewed by Felicia Hardison David Allen, Performing Chekov, reviewed by Laurence Senelick Vivan M. Patraka, Spectacular Suffering: Theatre, Fascism and the Holocaust, reviewed by Mariela Stevenson Anat Feinberg, Embodied Memory: The Theatre of George Tabori, reviewed by Edward Isser
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.435 | 0.433 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".