MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256440351 · doi:10.18733/c3rq2w

Ambivalence Blvd

2017· article· en· W4256440351 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dick Averns

Bibliographic record

VenueCultural and Pedagogical Inquiry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbivalenceNegotiationFeelingPoliticsDigital subscriber lineSociologyAestheticsMedia studiesArtPsychoanalysisPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital print from video still; digital print from E-6; digital print from DSL. Ambivalence Blvd navigates access to contested political and societal territories. It is rooted in contested values or worth. At its core is engagement with oppositional thoughts or feelings in one mind or body, toward another body or situation: a potential means for negotiation and reconciliation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2060.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.808
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultural and Pedagogical InquirySame topicDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesFrench-language works237,207