Laboratory Tests for Acute Alcohol Consumption: Results of the WHO/ISBRA Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The WHO/ISBRA Study on State and Trait Markers of Alcohol Use and Dependence aimed partly to evaluate the overall performance and cross-national validity of traditional and new biological markers of alcohol use and abuse. This article focused on the sensitivity and specificity of ethanol and methanol concentrations in plasma, and the 5-hydroxytryptophol (5HTOL) to 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5HIAA) ratio in urine, as laboratory tests to identify acute alcohol consumption. Comparison was made with self-reported drinking levels. Methods Subjects were recruited in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland, and Japan. They were interviewed thoroughly about their alcohol consumption habits, by using the standardized WHO/ISBRA Interview Schedule, and were classified into four categories: nondrinkers, light/moderate drinkers, heavy drinkers (≥210 g ethanol/week for men, and ≥140 g/week for women), or patients who were receiving treatment for alcohol dependence. Ethanol and methanol determinations in plasma were carried out by headspace gas chromatography. Urinary concentrations of 5HTOL and 5HIAA were determined by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. Results The baseline levels (in nondrinkers) for methanol and the 5HTOL/5HIAA ratio did not differ markedly between the five populations, except for a considerably higher, but probably artifactual, methanol level in the Finnish plasma samples. Moreover, there were no apparent age or sex differences. The urinary 5HTOL/5HIAA ratio was the most, and ethanol the least, sensitive indicator of recent alcohol consumption, and this was true for the different drinking categories as well as for the five study populations. The highest frequency of elevated test results was observed among those classified as heavy drinkers (e.g., 38% were positive for 5HTOL/5HIAA). However, elevated values also were obtained in nondrinkers and in drinking subjects who denied any intake of alcohol within 2 days before the interview and blood/urine sampling, which suggested a low accuracy of self-reports of alcohol consumption in certain individuals. Conclusions The present investigation demonstrated that plasma ethanol and methanol and urinary 5HTOL/5HIAA provide useful exclusion markers for any study of biological parameters that are affected by previous acute ethanol intoxication. The major advantage of methanol and 5HTOL/5HIAA over ethanol is that they can detect recent alcohol consumption even several hours after the ethanol is no longer measurable. The results suggest that the cutoff limits to be used for these markers are not dependent on the country or population to be studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".