MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Benvenuto Cellini

2016· dataset· it· W4256491753 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diletta Gamberini

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2016
Typedataset
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benvenuto Cellini (b. 1500–d. 1571) was a Florentine goldsmith, sculptor, and writer. His tempestuous and violent life, vividly narrated in his autobiography, La Vita di Benvenuto di maestro Giovanni Cellini fiorentino, scritta, per lui medesimo, in Firenze (c. 1558–1567), is characterized by a strenuous and fiercely competitive pursuit of excellence in art and by an often frustrated ambition to be recognized as the greatest artist of his times. These features appear to be constant throughout his long artistic career, which scholars have profitably divided into four salient phases: the wandering juvenile apprenticeship as a goldsmith, which found the professional coronation in the subsequent Roman-centered years within the papal Curia; the period at the French court of François I Valois, during which he completed his first sculptures; the Florentine maturity, which saw his triumph (with the unveiling, in 1554, of the Perseus and Medusa group, traditionally considered as his sculptural masterpiece); and his subsequent decline. Due to his irascible temper and marked egotism, he had numerous conflicts with contemporary fellow artists, while his firm belief in the exceptional value of his own art led him to engage with powerful patrons with an obstinate awareness of what he considered to be his rights and, frequently, an uncommon lack of courtly compliance. In his later Florentine years he found himself more and more marginalized as an artist at the court of Cosimo I and Francesco de’ Medici. In this situation, as he wrote in the twelfth chapter of the Trattato dell’oreficeria, in order to fill the void caused by the absence of relevant artistic commissions, he decided to become a writer. In the last two decades of his life, he composed a lengthy and unfinished autobiography, more than one hundred vernacular poems, two treatises on goldsmithing and sculpture, and several discourses on art. Indeed, for a long time Benvenuto Cellini’s fame rested on his accomplishments as a writer, rather than on the works he created as a goldsmith and sculptor. First published in 1730, the Vita enjoyed enormous popularity in the 19th century, when its author came to be seen as a proto-Romantic incarnation of the passions and intemperances of artistic genius: as such, the artist was the protagonist of historical novels like Alexandre Dumas père’s historical novel Benvenuto Cellini, as well as of operas like Camille Saint-Saëns’s Ascanio or Hector Berlioz’s Benvenuto Cellini. Mainly thanks to the enduring fortune of his autobiography, Cellini is still widely considered to be one of the most versatile talents, as well as one of the most extraordinary writers, of his age. Starting from the late 20th century, scholars have, however, finally begun to fully appreciate him also as a great Italian artist of the High Renaissance. Updates completed by Ilenia Viola.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207