Constraints on the emplacement of Martian nakhlite igneous rocks and their source volcano from advanced micro-petrofabric analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Martian nakhlite meteorites, ormed from a single magma source region, and emplaced during multiple events spanning at least 93 ± 12 Ma, represent a key opportunity to study the evolution of Martian volcanic petrogenesis. Here 16 of the 26 identified nakhlite specimens are studied using coupled large area electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping to determine shape preferred orientation (SPO) textures of contained augite (high Ca-clinopyroxene) phenocrysts by considering crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO). Textural parameters derived from EBSD and EDS analyses were used to calculate maximum and minimum magma body crystallization thicknesses via three endmember emplacement scenarios: thermal diffusion, crystal settling, and crystal convection. Results from CPO textural analyses indicate weak to moderate fabric textures that are comparable to those in terrestrial clinopyroxenites. In all samples, a consistent foliation within the {001} axis of augite is observed. In all but two of the studied nakhlites this {001} foliation is typically coupled with a weaker lineation fabric in one or more of the {100}, {010}, {001} axes. Results from the calculated magma body thicknesses are consistent with an emplacement mechanism for the nakhlites driven by crystal settling. These crystal settling results infer magmatic body thicknesses ranging from <1 m to several 10’s m, forming two distinguishable groups that appear random when assessed against observed texture, geochemical, and age parameters. Coupled textural and modelling results therefore suggest that the nakhlite source volcano varied in thickness over time yet consistently solidified via the mechanism of crystal settling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".