MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256574961 · doi:10.4000/communication.11828

Ulla CARLSSON et Lennart WEIBULL (2018), Freedom of Expression in the Digital Media Culture

2020· article· en· W4256574961 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Véronique Leclerc

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSecurity, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeibull distributionFreedom of expressionDigital cultureDigital mediaHumanitiesMathematicsComputer sciencePolitical scienceMedia studiesPhilosophySociologyStatisticsLawWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteurs présentent dans cet ouvrage une étude de cas visant à comprendre la perception qu’ont les Suédois de la liberté d’expression en ces temps de changement et d’évolution au sein de la culture numérique des médias. Ils s’intéressent aux impacts de la technologie numérique en lien avec la démocratisation de la sphère publique ainsi qu’aux problèmes liés à la relation entre la liberté d’expression et la vie privée, aux limites de celle-ci et aux domaines dans lesquels ces limites pourra...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicSecurity, Politics, and Digital TransformationFrench-language works237,207