Book reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jörg Gerkrath, L'Emergence d'un Droit Constitutionnel pour L'Europe, Etudes Européennes, Brussels, 1997, ISBN 2–8004–1179–1,420 pp. P.J.G. Kapteyn and P. VerLoren van Themaat, edited by Laurence W. Gormley, Introduction to the Law of the European Communities, Kluwer Law International, London, Third Edition, 1998, ISBN 90–411–9667–6, 1447 pp. Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, UCL Press, London, 1999, ISBN 1–85728–192–6, 514 pp. Colette Mazzucelli, France and Germany at Maastricht. Politics and Negotiations to Create the European Union, Garland Publishing, New York, 1997, ISBN 0–8153–2195–3, 353 pp. C.C. Paraskevopoulos (ed.), European Union at the Crossroads — A Critical Analysis of Monetary Union and Enlargement, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998, (International, 1995), ISBN 1–85898–762–8, 205 pp. Jan Zielonka, Explaining Euro‐Paralysis: Why Europe is Unable to Act in International Politics, MacMillan and St. Martin's Press, London and New York, 1997, ISBN 0–312–21463–4, 266 pp. Ingemar Dörfer, The Nordic Nations in the New Western Security Regime, Woodrow Wilson Centre Press, Washington, 1997, ISBN 0–943875–82‐X, 103 pp. Gonzales Alonso and Luis Norberto, Política Comercial y Relaciones Exteriores de la Union Europea, Editorial Tecnos, Madrid, 1998, ISBN 84–309–3210–0, 431 pp. Larry Neal and Daniel Barbezat, The Economics of the European Union and the Economies of Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, ISBN 0–19–511068–4, 396 pp. Brent F. Nelsen and Alexander C.‐G. Stubb (eds), The European Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, 2nd edition, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, 1998, XI, ISBN 1–55587–804–0, 357 pp. Alasdair Blair, Dealing With Europe: Britain and the Negotiations of the Maastricht Treaty, Aldershot, UK/Brookfield, US, Ashgate, 1999, ISBN 184014 762, x + 285 pp. Peter H. Loedel, Deutsche Mark Politics. Germany in the European Monetary System, Lynne Riener, Boulder Colorado, 1999, ISBN 1–55587–835–0, 262 pp. Pierre‐Henri Laurent and Marc Maresceau (eds), The State of the European Union. Volume 4. Deepening and Widening, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colorado/London, 1998, ISBN 1–55587–720–6, x + 374 pp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.534 | 0.517 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".