Effect of Fabrication Variables on Irradiation Response of Crack Growth Resistance of Zr-2.5Nb
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Specimens of pressure tubes made from Zr-2.5Nb by various fabrication routes were irradiated in research reactors to evaluate the response of their fracture toughness (represented by crack growth resistance, dJ/da) at 250°C to irradiation by fast neutrons (E > 1 MeV). The reference route consists of melting Kroll sponge and some recycled material, primary hot-working, extrusion at 815°C, and cold-working 27 %. Tubes made from ingots that were melted four times (quadruple melting) are initially tougher than tubes made from ingots that have been melted twice (double melting), and after irradiation the former retain close to 50 % of their original crack growth resistance while the latter retain less than 30 % of theirs. The high toughness and its retention in the quadruple melted material are attributed to low concentrations of chlorine. Tubes made from electrolytic powder contain fluorine rather than chlorine. Fluorine is less damaging than chlorine. Crack growth resistance and its retention with irradiation of tubes made from electrolytic powder are intermediate between those of tubes made from quadruple and double melted sponge. Lowering the amount of cold-work is beneficial, and the toughness of tubes made with less than 27 % cold-work correlates well with strength, both before and after irradiation. Lowering the extrusion temperature produces strong, tough tubes, but these tubes lose much of their crack growth resistance with irradiation. This loss in toughness is not associated with material chemistry but with a high sensitivity to strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".