Bibliographic record
Abstract
Labreche and Hrynchak of the University of Waterloo School of Optometry & Vision Science on the experiential learning opportunities provided in the external geriatric and pediatric clinics.Providing care for these two demographics of our population sometimes requires skills and knowledge that practitioners do not exercise regularly while providing for the needs of the "average" patient.Their comments provide good food for thought.We round out this issue with a couple of interesting clinical papers which I hope you will enjoy.In many optometric practices, the autorefractor has replaced retinoscopy.Corneal mappers and topographers have supplanted keratometers, and a vast array of imaging techniques has largely consigned direct ophthalmoscopy to a very limited role in assessment of the posterior segment.Recently, liquid crystal lenses have been introduced for occlusion therapy as an alternative to eye patches.The many different types of single vision and progressive addition lenses available to us belies the belief of one of my long-departed colleagues in ophthalmic optics that "optics will never change."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.023 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".