MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4256662119 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/pc7ak

Next-Gen AI for Disease Definition, Patient Stratification, and Placebo Effect

2020· preprint· en· W4256662119 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Tsay, Joseph Geraci, Abhishek Agrawal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecision medicineComputer scienceClinical trialDiseaseArtificial intelligenceMedicineData scienceMedical physicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a review of technology developed at the labs of NetraMark Corp. The technology advances the promise of precision medicine by providing explainable AI through an augmented intelligence interactive platform. The system described herein has the ability to accurately discover unknown patient sub-types so that a powerful new taxonomy of complex disorders can be discovered. Further, each subtype is clearly explained. This advancement means that clinical trials can be optimized and drug discovery clearly focused around precise etiologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education→French-language works237,207→