MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256675745 · doi:10.1177/120347540300700307

Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, Presenting as an Ulcer That Appears to Be Filled with Granulation Tissue

2003· article· en· W4256675745 on OpenAlexaff
Michal S. Kalisiak, David Edwards, Andrew N. Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGranulation tissueBasal cellSkin cancerBiopsyEpidermolysis bullosaDermatologyBasal cell carcinomaCancerCarcinomaPathologySurgeryWound healingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) is an important cause of death in patients with the severe form of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). These cancers often present with features that are different from those of actinically induced SCCA. Objective: To emphasize the unusual features with which SCCA can present in RDEB and discuss early recognition of such cancers. Methods: We present the case of a patient with RDEB who developed a cutaneous ulcer that appeared to be filled with heaped-up granulation tissue. Biopsy, however, showed moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Results: The patient underwent wide surgical excision of the cancer, with split-thickness skin graft. She has remained disease-free three years later. Conclusion: In patients with RDEB, any ulcer that appears to be filled with heaped-up granulation tissue should be biopsied to rule out SCCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207