MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256685494 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2019.0021

Editor's Note

2019· article· en· W4256685494 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christopher Keep

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)Art historyPsychicClassicsEditorial boardHistoryPsychoanalysisSociologyArtMedia studiesPsychologyLibrary scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Note Christopher Keep We welcome Abigail Boucher and Daniel Jenkin-Smith as guest editors of this issue's forum, which is dedicated to different bodily fluids, such as tears and breast milk. Far from reticent in their treatment of literally fluid aspects of human experience, the essays they have brought together demonstrate the extent to which the substances that bodies generate and emanate, whether linked with health or disease, are central to the Victorian history of the body. In its concluding essay, by L. Anne Delgado, the forum extends its reach to consider ectoplasm, the history of which signals the centrality of fluids to psychic as well as physical experience. The winning essay of the 2018 Hamilton Prize competition is "'The Limits of the Imaginable'": Women Writers' Networks during the Long Nineteenth Century" by Andrea Stewart (University of St. Thomas). We are pleased to publish this exceptional contribution to the field of Victorian studies in the current issue. The Hamilton Prize is awarded to the best essay submitted to our annual competition by a graduate student. Our grateful thanks go to the advisory board members who generously served as judges: Stephen Arata (University of Virginia), Holly Furneaux (University of Leicester), and Catherine Delyfer (Université Toulouse–Jean Jaurès). This issue features, too, the first of two clusters of articles on animal studies. As Matthew Calarco puts it citing the work of Jacques Derrida, the question of the animal is "a question deriving from an animal who faces me, an interruption deriving from an animal, an animal whom I face and by whom I am faced and who calls my mode of existence into question" (5). For the Victorians, too, the encounter with the animal was a kind of interruption, breaking up the epistemic grounds by which the human might claim its evolutionary right to consume the natural world, and calling attention to the ethical implications of our conflicted relations with non-human agents. Drawing on the burgeoning scholarship on animal studies in the study of nineteenth-century literature and culture, the essays gathered here explore topics ranging from Darwin's research on worms and the 1875 Royal Commission on Vivisection to the challenge posed by vegetarianism to proponents of natural selection and the animality of the non-human species in Kipling's The Jungle Books. A second cluster of essays on animal studies will appear in our Fall 2020 issue. Work Cited Calarco, Matthew. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. Columbia UP, 2008. Google Scholar Copyright © 2019 Victorian Studies of Western Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207