MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280488958 · doi:10.1097/mat.0000000000001695

Erroneous Pressure Reading from an Unpowered Intra-aortic Balloon Pump: Case Report

2022· article· en· W4280488958 on OpenAlexaff
Dean Belway, Andrea Corrigan, Derek Manchuk, Bindu Bittira

Bibliographic record

VenueASAIO Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences NorthNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary bypassIntra-aortic balloon pumpBalloonCardiologyBlood pressureAortic pressureCardiac outputInternal medicineIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) technology is an established treatment modality for patients with acute cardiac failure. Advances in IABP technology have simplified use and reliability such that electromechanical malfunctions are relatively rare. We present a case of an unanticipated pressure output signal from a powered off Cardiosave IABP console resulting in an erroneous mean arterial blood pressure waveform being displayed during cardiopulmonary bypass. The patient suffered no ill effects and made a full recovery. As a result of this incident, our policies have been revised to ensure that all patients with an IABP brought to the operating room for surgery have at least two arterial lines, one of which is not off the IABP, to prevent future occurrences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0110.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASAIO JournalSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207