MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280490420 · doi:10.18280/jesa.550212

Fault Detection for a Nonlinear Switched Continuous Time Delayed System Using Machine Learning and Self-Switched UKF

2022· article· en· W4280490420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sayanti Chatterjee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceKalman filterFault detection and isolationFault (geology)Support vector machineArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterProbabilistic logicMachine learningAlgorithmComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this research is to propose a novel machine learning based fault detection algorithm for a nonlinear switched continuous system (NSCS) with time delayed measurements. A simulation model has been established through the analysis of the relevant constraints such as estimation errors derived from self-switched time- delayed (TD) Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). Machine learning techniques, specifically probabilistic principal components analysis (PPCA) and the support vector machine (SVM) have been successfully adopted on the database of the proposed model to detect and isolate the faults. ‘Three tank system’, the commonly used bench mark problem, has been re-employed here to prove the efficiency of the proposed estimation and fault detection algorithm. In this work, it is conjectured that the available measurements are time delayed. Through this study, the efficacy of the proposed time- delayed Unscented Kalman Filter (TD-UKF) and Machine Learning based fault detection have been demonstrated on the afore mentioned benchmark problem. The results indicates that Machine learning based algorithm can detect the fault with more accuracy and less false alarm than other statistical methods. The finding of this research can be used for any type of industrial system to detect the faults with better potential and higher range coverage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207