Preliminary Study of a Modular MR-Compatible Robot for Image-Guided Insertion of Multiple Needles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Percutaneous needle-based interventions such as transperineal prostate brachytherapy require the accurate placement of multiple needles to treat cancerous lesions within the target organ. To guide needle placement, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent visualization of the target lesion without the need for ionizing radiation. To date, multi-needle insertion relies on a grid template, which limits the ability to steer individual needles. This work describes an MR-compatible robot designed for the sequential insertion of multiple non-parallel needles under MR guidance. The 6-DOF system is designed with an articulated arm to extend the reach of the robot. This strategy presents a novel approach enabling the robot to maneuver around existing needles while minimizing the footprint of the robot. Forward kinematics as well as optimization-based inverse kinematics are presented. The impact of the robot on image quality was tested for four sequences (T1w-TSE, T2w-TSE, THRIVE and EPI) on a 3T Philips Achieva system. Quantification of the signal-to-noise ratio showed a 46% signal loss in a gelatin phantom when the system was powered on but no further adverse effects when the robot was moving. Joint level testing showed a maximum error of 2.10 ± 0.72°s for revolute joints and 0.31 ± 0.60 mm for prismatic joints. The theoretical workspace spans the proposed clinical target surface of 10 x 10 cm. Lastly, the feasibility of multi-needle insertion was demonstrated with four needles inserted under real-time MR-guidance with no visible loss in image quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".