MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Limits on the Light Dark Matter–Proton Cross Section from Cosmic Large-Scale Structure

2022· article· en· W4280491931 on OpenAlexafffund
Keir K. Rogers, Cora Dvorkin, Hiranya V. Peiris

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science FoundationVetenskapsrådetUniversity of TorontoH2020 European Research CouncilUniversity College LondonHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterProtonAstrophysicsParticle physicsCOSMIC cancer databaseSigmaStructure formationNuclear physicsCosmic rayBaryonAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We set the strongest limits to date on the velocity-independent dark matter (DM)--proton cross section $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ for DM masses $m=10\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$ to 100 GeV, using large-scale structure traced by the Lyman-alpha forest: e.g., a 95% lower limit $\ensuremath{\sigma}<6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}30}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, for $m=100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{keV}$. Our results complement direct detection, which has limited sensitivity to sub-GeV DM. We use an emulator of cosmological simulations, combined with data from the smallest cosmological scales used to date, to model and search for the imprint of primordial DM--proton collisions. Cosmological bounds are improved by up to a factor of 25.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207