MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280499215 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v15n2p32

Preference or Pre-Emption Right for Cultural Objects

2022· article· en· W4280499215 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
José Luís Bonifácio Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreferenceObject (grammar)Cultural heritageProperty (philosophy)Cultural propertyProperty rightsLaw and economicsPortuguesePolitical scienceLawSociologyEconomicsEpistemologyComputer scienceMicroeconomicsLinguisticsPhilosophyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preference or Pre-emption Right means the power of one party to acquire a certain object to the detriment of another making an identical claim, we need to establish a distinction by looking at the different powers underlying this act of preferring. If there are many preferences, the pre-emption over cultural property, also known as artistic or cultural preference, is a true category among other preferences. After studying the exercising of pre-emption rights, as well as their respective consequences, about Portuguese Law, we must ascertain their effectiveness, not only in terms of their viability in the effective acquisition of objects but, and equally, the objectives which this aims to pursue in terms of achieving the protection of cultural heritage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.024
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207