Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms Deregulate the CRL2pVHL Complex in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dysregulation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway genes through copy number alteration, promoter hypomethylation, and miRNA deregulation is involved in cancer development and progression. Further characterizing alterations in these genes may uncover novel drug targets across a range of diseases in which druggable alterations are uncommon, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed 377 HCC and 59 adjacent non-malignant liver tissue samples, focusing on alterations to component genes of the widely studied CRL2pVHL E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. mRNA upregulation of the component genes was common, and was correlated with DNA hypomethylation and copy number increase, but many tumours displayed overexpression that was not explained by either mechanism. Interestingly, we found 66 miRNAs, including 39 previously unannotated miRNAs, that were downregulated in HCC and predicted to target one or more CRL2pVHL components. Several miRNAs, including hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-139-5p, were negatively correlated with multiple component genes, suggesting that miRNA deregulation may contribute to CRL2pVHL overexpression. Combining miRNA and mRNA expression, DNA copy number, and methylation status into one multidimensional survival analysis, we found a significant association between greater numbers of alterations and poorer overall survival for multiple component genes. While the intricacies of CRL2pVHL complex gene regulation require additional research, it is evident that multiple causes for the deregulation of these genes must be considered in HCC, including non-traditional mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".