A Systematic Study on Electromyography-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Assistive Robots Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upper limb amputation severely affects the quality of life and the activities of daily living of a person. In the last decade, many robotic hand prostheses have been developed which are controlled by using various sensing technologies such as artificial vision and tactile and surface electromyography (sEMG). If controlled properly, these prostheses can significantly improve the daily life of hand amputees by providing them with more autonomy in physical activities. However, despite the advancements in sensing technologies, as well as excellent mechanical capabilities of the prosthetic devices, their control is often limited and usually requires a long time for training and adaptation of the users. The myoelectric prostheses use signals from residual stump muscles to restore the function of the lost limbs seamlessly. However, the use of the sEMG signals in robotic as a user control signal is very complicated due to the presence of noise, and the need for heavy computational power. In this article, we developed motion intention classifiers for transradial (TR) amputees based on EMG data by implementing various machine learning and deep learning models. We benchmarked the performance of these classifiers based on overall generalization across various classes and we presented a systematic study on the impact of time domain features and pre-processing parameters on the performance of the classification models. Our results showed that Ensemble learning and deep learning algorithms outperformed other classical machine learning algorithms. Investigating the trend of varying sliding window on feature-based and non-feature-based classification model revealed interesting correlation with the level of amputation. The study also covered the analysis of performance of classifiers on amputation conditions since the history of amputation and conditions are different to each amputee. These results are vital for understanding the development of machine learning-based classifiers for assistive robotic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".