MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280516007 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2022.100880

Development of minimally invasive 13C-glucose breath test to examine different exogenous carbohydrate sources in patients with glycogen storage disease type Ia

2022· article· en· W4280516007 on OpenAlexafffund
Abrar Turki, Sylvia Stöckler, Sandra Sirrs, Ramona Salvarinova, Gloria Ho, Jennifer Branov, Annie Rosen-Heath, Taryn Bosdet, Rajavel Elango

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSaudi Arabian Cultural Bureau
KeywordsGlycogen storage diseaseGlycogenCarbohydrateCarbohydrate metabolismMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase), resulting in fasting hypoglycemia. Dietary treatment with provision of uncooked cornstarch (UCCS) or a novel modified cornstarch (Glycosade®) is available to treat hypoglycemia, yet choice of carbohydrate to achieve a desirable glycemic control is debated.13C-glucose breath test (13C-GBT) can be used to examine glucose metabolism from different carbohydrate sources via 13CO2 in breath. Our objectives were: 1) establishing the use of a minimally invasive 13C-GBT to examine in vivo glucose metabolism in healthy adults, and 2) using 13C-GBT to measure utilization of the standard UCCS vs. Glycosade® in GSD Ia and healthy controls. Experiment 1- Ten healthy adults (6F: 4 M, 22-33y) underwent 13C-GBT protocol twice as a proof-of-principle, once with oral isotope dose (glucose 75 g + [U-13C6] d-glucose 75 mg) and once without isotope (only glucose 75 g) to test sensitivity of natural 13C-enrichment. Breath samples were collected at baseline and every 20 min for 240 min. Rate of CO2 production was measured at 120 min using indirect calorimetry. Finger-prick blood glucose was measured using a glucometer hourly to test hypoglycemia (glucose <4 mmol/L). Experiment 2- Three GSD Ia (12y, 13y, and 28y) and six healthy controls (2F: 4 M, 10-32y) underwent 13C-GBT protocol twice: with UCCS or Glycosade® (based on their current prescribed dose 42-100 g) after ~4 h fast based on our GSD Ia patients with fasting tolerance. Findings 1- Maximum 13C-enrichments occurred at 200 min without and with [U-13C6] d-glucose in all healthy adults, suggesting natural enrichment is sensitive for the 13C-GBT. Findings 2- Glycosade® utilization was lower than UCCS utilization in 12y and 13y GSD Ia, but was similar in the 28y GSD Ia. 13C-GBT is a novel minimally invasive functional test to examine glucose metabolism in GSD Ia, and test new products like Glycosade®, which has the potential to improve nutritional management and individualized carbohydrate supply in GSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism ReportsSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207