MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280520126 · doi:10.38146/bsz.2022.5.13

Éltető erőforrásunk, a víz védelme napjainkban

2022· article· en· W4280520126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zsuzsanna Hornyik

Bibliographic record

VenueBelügyi Szemle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNAKComputer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. András Szöllősi-Nagy is an internationally renowned professor, by qualification an engineer, hydrologist. Doctor of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (management of hydrology and water management systems). He has been a visiting professor at several foreign universities (Sweden, Canada, Thailand, China). For twenty years he was Secretary of the UNESCO International Hydrology Programme in Paris, and he was Deputy Director- General of UNESCO’s Natural Sciences Sector for ten years. For the past five years, he has been rector of the UNESCO-IHE Institute of Water Science in Delft, the Netherlands. He is professor of Stochastic Hydrology at Delft University of Technology and at the UNESCO-IHE. His main research interests are stochastic hydrological systems and recursive forecasting algorithms, as well as the hydrological effects of sustainable development and climate change. Lecturer at the Faculty of Water Sciences of the University of Public Service, Honorary Doctor of the University of Debrecen. His professional opinion and resolutions – given his professional career so far – serve as a credible and effective guide for responsible water professionals. We asked the professor about how science serves national water management, what has happened so far and what we still need to do to conserve available water resources, and how extreme situations and epidemics affect these activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelügyi SzemleSame topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207