Dynamics of droplet impact on a superhydrophobic disk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental study is performed to investigate the effect of tangential velocity on the dynamics of a water droplet impacting on a spinning superhydrophobic surface. It is revealed that an increase in the tangential velocity results in the spreading of a droplet from symmetrical to asymmetrical shape on the superhydrophobic surface. Moreover, depending on the impact and tangential velocities, three behaviors are observed: bouncing, symmetrical splashing, and asymmetrical splashing. In the bouncing regime, it is found that the droplet contact time is independent of impact velocity and decreases as the tangential velocity increases. However, the maximum spreading diameter in this regime is a function of both the impact and the tangential velocities. Furthermore, a splashing threshold defined as WeRe1/21−kRe−1/2V/U2=K is introduced to estimate the transition between the bouncing, symmetrical splashing, and asymmetrical splashing regimes. It is revealed that the value of K in the present work (i.e., superhydrophobic spinning disk) is approximately 60% less than the K value obtained by other researchers for the case of aluminum spinning disk. Moreover, two values are found for k to define the boundaries between these three observed regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".