MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 162: Burden And Impact Of Chronic Kidney Disease On Admissions Of Cancer Survivors And Assessing The Odds Of Major Adverse Cardiac And Cerebrovascular Events

2022· article· en· W4280521993 on OpenAlexaff
Utsav Aiya, Rakin Rashid, Neel Patel, Avijit Deb, Brian Brereton, Bibi Alli-Ramsaroop, Rupak Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsGeorgetown Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseInternal medicineStroke (engine)CohortCancerAdverse effectOdds ratioCohort studyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cancer-specific adverse events are not well defined despite chronic kidney disease (CKD) being associated with high mortality rates in cancer patients. This study explores the prevalence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in cancer survivors with CKD from a national cohort. Methods: We identified cancer survivors with and without concomitant CKD along with their age, sex, race and other comorbidities who were admitted to hospitals in a National Inpatient Sample database (2018). We then identified odds of MACCE including all-cause mortality, AMI, cardiac arrest (including ventricular fibrillation) and stroke while subsequently analyzing healthcare resource utilization in patients with versus without CKD. Multivariable regression analyses were adjusted for patient and hospital level covariates and pre-existing comorbidities. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: CKD prevalence was higher among patients with a prior history of cancer versus those without it (21.5% vs 14.6%, p<0.001) in the cohort. Higher rates of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors, prior history of MI, stroke/TIA, VTE, CHF, coagulopathy and MACCE (11.5% vs 8.1%, OR 1.22 [CI 1.20 -1.25]) were observed in patients with versus without CKD [Table 1] in hospitalized cancer survivors. Said survivors with CKD were specifically noted to have higher rates of all-cause mortality (3.4% vs 2.2%, OR 1.33 [CI 1.29 -1.37]) and AMI (6.0% vs 3.3%, OR 1.54 [CI 1.50 - 1.58]) (all p<0.001). The CKD cohort had fewer routine discharges, more frequent transfers to other facilities, higher length of stay and hospital costs versus the non-CKD cohort (p<0.001). Conclusion: This large retrospective analysis shows elevated burden of CKD (21.5%) amongst hospitalized cancer survivors, which is associated with not only increased rates of MACCE, all-cause mortality, AMI, cardiac arrest but also greater overall healthcare costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207