Ghrelin Levels in Children With Intestinal Failure Receiving Long-Term Parenteral Nutrition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Children with intestinal failure (IF) require parenteral nutrition (PN). Transition to oral and enteral nutrition (EN) can be difficult also due to abnormal gastrointestinal motility. The gut hormone ghrelin is increased in states of negative energy balance, functioning to preserve euglycemia, and also has appetite stimulating and prokinetic properties. We aimed to evaluate and compare ghrelin levels in children with IF, and to assess the relationship with PN-dependency. Methods In this exploratory prospective multicenter study, plasma acylated (AG) and unacylated (UAG) ghrelin levels were measured in children with short bowel syndrome (SBS) and with functional IF (pseudo-obstruction or any enteropathy) and compared with healthy control subjects. Spearman’s rho (rs) was used to assess correlations of AG and UAG with PN-dependency (%PN) and parenteral glucose intake. Results Sixty-four samples from 36 IF-patients were analyzed. Median baseline AG and UAG levels were respectively 279.2 and 101.0 pg/mL in children with SBS (n = 16), 126.4 and 84.5 pg/mL in children with functional IF (n = 20) and 82.4 and 157.3 pg/mL in healthy children (n = 39). AG levels were higher in children with SBS and functional IF than in healthy children (p = 0.002 and p = 0.023, respectively). In SBS, AG positively correlated with %PN (rs = 0.5, p = 0.005) and parenteral glucose intake (rs = 0.6, p = 0.003). These correlations were not observed in functional IF. Conclusion Children with IF had raised AG levels which could be related to starvation of the gut. The positive correlation between AG and glucose infusion rate in SBS suggests an altered glucoregulatory function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".