MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280524395 · doi:10.3390/plants11101324

Ascorbic Acid Preconditioning Effect on Broccoli Seedling Growth and Photosynthesis under Drought Stress

2022· article· en· W4280524395 on OpenAlexaff
Mason T. MacDonald, Rajeswari Kannan, Renuga Jayaseelan

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscorbic acidPhotosynthesisSeedlingHorticultureChlorophyllShootChemistryBrassicaWater-use efficiencyBiologyAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drought is an abiotic stress that decreases crop photosynthesis, growth, and yield. Ascorbic acid has been used as a seed preconditioning agent to help mitigate drought in some species, but not yet in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). The objective was to investigate the effect of ascorbic acid on growth, photosynthesis, and related parameters in watered and drought-stressed broccoli seedlings. A 2 × 4 factorial experiment was designed where stress (watered or drought) was the first factor and ascorbic acid preconditioning (untreated, 0 ppm, 1 ppm, or 10 ppm) was the second factor. Positioning within the greenhouse was included as a blocking factor and the experiment was replicated three times. All seedlings were watered for 8 weeks and then half had water withheld for 7 days to impose drought while the other half continued to be watered. Ascorbic acid preconditioning increased shoot dry mass, root dry mass, water use efficiency, and photosynthesis in all seedlings while also increasing chlorophyll, relative water content, and leaf area in droughted seedlings. Ascorbic acid preconditioning also decreased membrane injury in droughted seedlings to the point that membrane injury was not significantly different than the watered control. There was strong evidence to support ascorbic acid as a successful seed preconditioning agent in watered and droughted broccoli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207