MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280526617 · doi:10.26685/urncst.335

The Effect of GLP-1 and GIP on the Microvascular Blood Flow after Consuming a Mixed Nutrient Meal: A Research Protocol

2022· article· en· W4280526617 on OpenAlexaff
Lachlan T. MacLean, Ryan T. Bevington, Adham H.H.G. Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyIncretinInsulinBlood flowMedicineGastric inhibitory polypeptideGlucagon-like peptide-1Diabetes mellitusGlucagonType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Nutrient and gas exchange via microvascular blood flow is a key process of circulatory function. There is a significant decrease in the microvascular blood flow to skeletal muscle after orally ingesting glucose. Incretins like glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), are released in response to glucose in the gut, stimulating insulin release. Our protocol plans to investigate if incretins and the subsequent insulin release contribute to the decrease in microvascular blood flow. Methods: 20 healthy young adults will consume a high glucose mixed nutrient meal. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) and a blood glucose meter, microvascular blood flow and blood glucose will be measured. Blood GLP-1 and GIP will be measured using a sandwich enzyme immunoassay, while an electrochemiluminescence technique using an autoanalyzer will measure insulin. Measurements will be recorded at 0, 1, and 2 hours post-prandial. In a randomized order, the protocol will be repeated with infusion of GIP and GLP-1 inhibitors, GIP(3-30)NH2 and exendin(9-39)NH2 or saline. Results: With normal incretin secretion, we anticipate a significant decrease in microvascular blood flow, along with an increase in blood insulin, GIP/GLP-1 levels. We postulate that supressing incretins will increase the microvascular blood flow along with decreased plasma insulin and no change in GLP-1/GIP levels. Discussion: Through our methods, we propose a study design which evaluates the relationship of incretins and insulin on post-prandial microvascular blood flow. Our expected results aim to provide data that can be applied to the progressive treatment of type II diabetes with incretins like GLP-1. Understanding the impact of incretin treatment on the microvascular blood flow could be beneficial to the discovery of an adverse effect or how glucose uptake in peripheral tissues is altered. These are vital aspects of developing a clinical treatment to diabetes and our results will provide a basis to work off. Conclusion: The goal of this protocol was to investigate and provide insight to fully understand incretins and their effects. It will propel research on the biochemical pathways involving incretin and microvascular blood flow, which then helps progress treatment of complications like diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207