MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280532359 · doi:10.36548/jismac.2022.1.003

DDoS Detection using Machine Learning Techniques

2022· article· en· W4280532359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Amrish, K. Bavapriyan, V. Gopinaath, A Jawahar, C. Vinoth Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ISMAC · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenial-of-service attackComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDecision treeRandom forestApplication layer DDoS attackTrinooComputer securityArtificial neural networkNetwork securityComputer networkOperating systemThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is a type of cyber-attack that attempts to interrupt regular traffic on a targeted server by overloading the target. The system under DDoS attack remains occupied with the requests from the bots rather than providing service to legitimate users. These kinds of attacks are complicated to detect and increase day by day. In this paper, machine learning algorithm is employed to classify normal and DDoS attack traffic. DDoS attacks are detected using four machine learning classification techniques. The machine learning algorithms are tested and trained using the CICDDoS2019 dataset, gathered by the Canadian Institute of Cyber Security. When compared against KNN, Decision Tree, and Random Forest, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) generates the best results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ISMACSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207