Affective Brain-Computer Music Interface in Emotion Regulation and Neurofeedback: A Research Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Emotion regulation is an integral part of mental health, dynamically impacting brain function, as one’s emotions change continuously throughout the day. Impairments in emotion regulation are associated with a range of psychiatric disorders. Although the implications of emotion regulation are crucial to mental health, few studies have examined training emotion regulation strategies with respect to the brain. Thus, we propose an affective brain-computer music interface (aBCMI) prototype for emotion regulation that continuously generates music by estimating emotions from real-time electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Methods: In this proposal, we describe our prototype consisting of an emotion classifier that detects the expression of emotions from EEG signals, and a music generator that generates music reflective of those emotions. We evaluate our prototype in three separate studies. In study 1, we test the accuracy of the music generator. In study 2, we test the accuracy of the emotion classifier by assessing its correlation with real-time, self-reported emotions. In study 3, the generative music algorithm is used to explore emotion regulation strategies. Discussion: The proposed BCMI is expected to accurately estimate emotions, provide musical feedback of participants’ emotions, and enable users to intentionally modulate their emotions from musical feedback. This involves capturing the listener’s emotions in real-time using EEG signals, providing the opportunity to regulate one’s emotional state with musical feedback. Thus, in addition to enabling greater neurofeedback training of emotions, our prototype can enhance the understanding of affective computing and emotions with EEG and machine learning. Conclusions: Clinical applications of this prototype may have a tremendous impact as a neurofeedback tool in music therapy for training emotion regulation. Future research may benefit from using the proposed BCMI as a neurofeedback treatment in mood disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".