MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280541453 · doi:10.1109/iotm.002.2200022

Touchless Control of Heavy Equipment Using Low-Cost Hand Gesture Recognition

2022· article· en· W4280541453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoaderGestureGesture recognitionLaptopComputer scienceProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human-machine interaction using remote hand gestures is becoming increasingly prevalent across various industries. However, their potential application to heavy construction equipment is often overlooked. This article presents a robust and inexpensive hand gesture recognition system that was implemented and tested on a robotic 1-tonne wheel loader. The system uses an RGB camera paired with a laptop to process, in real time, hand gestures to control the loader. We first design four unique gestures for controlling the loader and then collect 26,000 images to train and test a neural network for hand gesture recognition. Our system uses robust landmark detection using an off-the-shelf system prior to gesture recognition. We successfully controlled the loader to excavate in a rock pile by using the proposed hand gesture recognition system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it