Optimization of PVA/TiO2/MMT mixed matrix membrane for food packaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nanocomposite films performance parameters, including barrier and properties for packaging films, can be affected by variables such as the type and concentration of nanoparticles. In this investigation, Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanocomposite films were prepared by solution casting method with different combinations of Montmorillonite (MMT) platelets and Titanium Oxide (TiO 2 ) spherical nanoparticles.A support vector machine (SVM) was implemented to study the thin nanocomposite films' behavior to changes in the independent variables. The SVM model predicted oxygen transmission rate (OTR), water vapor permeability (WVP|), Young ̓s Modulus (YM), ΔE, opacity, tensile strength (TS), and elongation at the breakpoint (EB) with an error of less than 6.43%. A Genetic Algorithm (GA) was applied to find the optimal nanoparticle concentration to achieve optimum film performance. Therefore, the results exhibited that the optimum film performance depends on the type and concentration of nanoparticles. Results show that the optimum loading of nanoparticles in this research should be between 0.5-1 wt% for TiO 2 and 2.5–3.5 wt% for MMT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".