MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4280545550 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.112012

Improved search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in water with the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SNO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>detector</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2022· article· lv· W4280545550 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Allega, M. R. Anderson, S. Andringa, M. Askins, D. J. Auty, A. Bacon, N. Barros, F. Barão, T. S. Bezerra, A. Białek, S. D. Biller, E. Caden, S. H. Cheng, M. Chen, O. Chkvorets, B. T. Cleveland, D. Cookman, J. Corning, M. A. Cox, R. Dehghani, C. Deluce, M. M. Depatie, J. Dittmer, K. H. Dixon, F. Di Lodovico, E. Falk, N. Fatemighomi, R. Ford, K. Frankiewicz, A. Gaur, O. I. González-Reina, D. Gooding, C. Grant, J. E. Grove, A. L. Hallin, D. Hallman, J. Hartnell, W. J. Heintzelman, R. L. Helmer, Jie Hu, R. Hunt-Stokes, SA Hussain, A. S. Inácio, C. J. Jillings, T. Kaptanoglu, P. Khaghani, Hamza Khan, J. R. Klein, L. L. Kormos, B. Krar, C. Kraus, C. B. Krauss, Tereza Kroupova, I. Lam, Benjamin Land, I. Lawson, L. Lebanowski, J. Lee, C. Lefebvre, J. Lidgard, Yen-Hsun Lin, V. Lozza, M. Luo, A. Maio, S. Manecki, J. Maneira, R. D. Martín, N. McCauley, A. B. McDonald, M. Meyer, C. Mills, I. Morton-Blake, S. Naugle, L. J. Nolan, H. M. O’Keeffe, G. D. Orebi Gann, J. Page, William C. Parker, J. Paton, S. J. M. Peeters, L. Pickard, P. Ravi, A. Reichold, S. Riccetto, R. Richardson, M. Rigan, J. Rose, J. Rumleskie, I. Semenec, P. Skensved, M. Smiley, R. Svoboda, B. Tam, J. C-L. Tseng, E. Turner, S. Valder, J. G. C. Veinot, C. J. Virtue, E. Vázquez-Jáuregui, J. Wang, M. Ward, Jan J. Weigand, J. D. Wilson, J. R. Wilson, A. Wright, J. P. Yanez, S. Yang, M. Yeh, S. S. Yu, T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Κ. Zuber, A. Zummo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFLaurentian UniversityUniversity of AlbertaQueen's University
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilRutherford Appleton LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinistry of Economic Development and Trade, Government of AlbertaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Nuclear Security AdministrationUniversity of California BerkeleyOffice of ScienceCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceQueen's UniversityConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaHigh Energy PhysicsDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of AlbertaEuropean CommissionWestern Canada Research GridSeventh Framework ProgrammeH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsStrongCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchFermilabNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of CaliforniaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsNucleonParticle physicsEnergy (signal processing)AlgorithmMachine learningNuclear physicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports results from a search for single and multinucleon disappearance from the $^{16}\mathrm{O}$ nucleus in water within the $\mathrm{SNO}+$ detector using all of the available data. These so-called ``invisible'' decays do not directly deposit energy within the detector but are instead detected through their subsequent nuclear deexcitation and gamma-ray emission. New limits are given for the partial lifetimes: $\ensuremath{\tau}(n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv})>\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}9.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{29}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$, $\ensuremath{\tau}(p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv})>9.6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{29}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$, $\ensuremath{\tau}(nn\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv})>1.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{28}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$, $\ensuremath{\tau}(np\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv})>\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}6.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{28}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$, and $\ensuremath{\tau}(pp\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv})>1.1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{29}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{years}$ at 90% Bayesian credibility level (with a prior uniform in rate). All but the ($nn\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{inv}$) results improve on existing limits by a factor of about 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→