MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280547561 · doi:10.4155/bio-2022-0078

2021 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Mass Spec of Proteins, Extracellular Vesicles, CRISPR, Chiral Assays, Oligos; Nanomedicines Bioanalysis; ICH M10 Section 7.1; Non-Liquid &amp; Rare Matrices; Regulatory Inputs ( <u>Part 1A</u> – Recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC &amp; <u>Part 1B</u> - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene &amp; Cell Therapy and Vaccine)

2022· article· en· W4280547561 on OpenAlexaff
Surinder Kaur, Stephen C. Alley, Matt Szapacs, Amanda Wilson, Eugene Ciccimaro, Dian Su, Neil Henderson, Linzhi Chen, Fabio Garofolo, Shawna Hengel, Wenying Jian, John F. Kellie, Anita Lee, John T. Mehl, Joe Palandra, Haibo Qiu, Natasha Savoie, Diaá M. Shakleya, Ludovicus Staelens, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Giane Sumner, Jan Welink, Robert Wheller, Y-J Xue, Jianing Zeng, Jinhui Zhang, Huiyu Zhou, Jian Wang, Scott Summerfield, Olga Kavetska, Lieve Dillen, Ragu Ramanathan, Mike Baratta, Arindam Das-Gupta, Anna Edmison, Luca Ferrari, Sally Fischer, Daniela Fraier, Sam Haidar, Kathrin Heermeier, Christopher James, Allena Ji, Lina Luo, Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos, Noah Post, Anton I. Rosenbaum, Sune Hove Sporring, Sekhar Surapaneni, Stephen Vinter, Katty Wan, Eric Woolf, Seongeun Cho, Elham Kossary, Sandra Prior, Mohsen Rajabi Abhari, Catherine Soo, Yow‐Ming Wang, Abbas Bandukwala, Elana Cherry, Isabelle Cludts, Soma Ghosh, Shirley Hopper, Akiko Ishii‐Watabe, Susan Kirshner, Kevin Maher, Kimberly Maxfield, João Pedras-Vasconcelos, Yoshiro Saito, Dean Smith, Therese Solstad, Daniela Verthelyi, Meenu Wadhwa, Leslie Wagner, Günter Waxenecker, Haoheng Yan, Lucia Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBioanalysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaSeagen (Canada)
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsBioanalysisWhite paperExcellenceComputer scienceComputational biologyPolitical scienceNanotechnologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term "Context of Use - COU"); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and, critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparabil ity & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 10 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0110.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.140

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioanalysisSame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207