MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Model Predictive Control-Based Voltage and Frequency Regulation through Distributed Generation in Isolated Microgrids: Part I Development and Parameterization of the Data-Driven Predictive Model

2022· article· en· W4280548067 on OpenAlexaff
Md Nasmus Sakib Khan Shabbir, Xiaodong Liang, Weixing Li, Syed Imtiaz, John E. Quaicoe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlComputer scienceData modelingVoltageControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Voltage regulationControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a low-voltage islanded microgrid, the distribution line impedance and relatively large power angle may lead to active and reactive power coupling during voltage and frequency control actions, which cause errors for the conventional droop control at the interfacing inverter of distributed generation (DG) units. To overcome this issue, a novel model predictive control-based voltage and frequency regulation at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) through DGs in isolated microgrids is proposed. The results of this work are presented in this two-part paper. In Part 1, a data-driven predictive model for DGs is developed and parameterized through the system identification approach using Gauss-Newton (GN)-based Nonlinear Least Square (NLS) method. The polynomial input-output Box-Jenkins model is chosen as the model structure. This model will be further used in Part 2 to implement a Model predictive controller. The proposed model incorporates distribution line parameters into the control algorithm and allows a wider variation of power angle without initiating nonlinearity. Therefore, it can substantially reduce the controller size and complexity, and widen the controller’s operational range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207