Unbiased analysis of mouse brain endothelial networks from two- or three-dimensional fluorescence images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: A growing body of research supports the significant role of cerebrovascular abnormalities in neurological disorders. As these insights develop, standardized tools for unbiased and high-throughput quantification of cerebrovascular structure are needed. Aim: We provide a detailed protocol for performing immunofluorescent labeling of mouse brain vessels, using thin (25 μm) or thick (50 to 150 μm) tissue sections, followed respectively by two- or three-dimensional (2D or 3D) unbiased quantification of vessel density, branching, and tortuosity using digital image processing algorithms. Approach: Mouse brain sections were immunofluorescently labeled using a highly selective antibody raised against mouse Cluster of Differentiation-31 (CD31), and 2D or 3D microscopy images of the mouse brain vasculature were obtained using optical sectioning. An open-source toolbox, called Pyvane, was developed for analyzing the imaged vascular networks. The toolbox can be used to identify the vasculature, generate the medial axes of blood vessels, represent the vascular network as a graph, and calculate relevant measurements regarding vascular morphology. Results: Using Pyvane, vascular parameters such as endothelial network density, number of branching points, and tortuosity are quantified from 2D and 3D immunofluorescence micrographs. Conclusions: The steps described in this protocol are simple to follow and allow for reproducible and unbiased analysis of mouse brain vascular structure. Such a procedure can be applied to the broader field of vascular biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".